Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: Small Light Programs Better

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    California
    Beans
    638

    Small Light Programs Better

    Maybe I'm old-fashioned or just old. It seems to me small, efficient programs are better than big conglomerate programs that include everything but the kitchen sink. They run better and faster and they don't have a gagillion options I'll never use in my life. The same for desktop or window managers. For instance I like:

    Audacious vs Rhythmbox/Amarok/iTunes
    AbiWord vs Libre/Word
    OpenBox vs Kde/Gnome/Unity/OSX/Windows

    And so on.

    Was just wondering how many of you feel that software went off the rails long ago with trying to include millions of "features" no one actually needs?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Down Under
    Beans
    1,568
    Distro
    Ubuntu Budgie 18.04 Bionic Beaver

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    I agree. That's why I use Lubuntu on my laptop and Xubuntu on my desktop.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Beans
    5,636

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    Quote Originally Posted by mooreted View Post
    Maybe I'm old-fashioned or just old. It seems to me small, efficient programs are better than big conglomerate programs that include everything but the kitchen sink. They run better and faster and they don't have a gagillion options I'll never use in my life. The same for desktop or window managers. For instance I like:

    Audacious vs Rhythmbox/Amarok/iTunes
    AbiWord vs Libre/Word
    OpenBox vs Kde/Gnome/Unity/OSX/Windows

    And so on.

    Was just wondering how many of you feel that software went off the rails long ago with trying to include millions of "features" no one actually needs?
    +1 for your thoughts.
    More features == perhaps a bit more functionality (when present), some eye candy, but also TONS of additional bugs and more computing resources needed.

    We've reached the point when (both in windows and linux) we need half a gig of ram (or more) to do exactly the same things we did a decade ago with 1/5 (1/10?) of that power.

  4. #4
    WasMeHere is offline Iced Almond Soy Ubuntu, No Foam
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sverige
    Beans
    1,133

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    +1
    Have fun
    Olle

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Beans
    749
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    You got that right.
    Moderation in all things; including moderation.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Birmingham UK
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu Development Release

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    +1 most of the time

    I must use LibreOffice for presentations and writing handouts though (LibreOffice Maths formula handling is good and fast - yes I do know about LaTeX/TeX/Lyx). Gnumeric has nice graphs, Abiword is much better than it used to be but can't manage the layouts &c yet. I'm watching it though.

    I like Firefox for the plugins (Zotero)

    The rest is lightish

    mtpaint can do the things I need to do to photographs in place of GIMP on the netbook

    MOC is just a nice console music player period. I use that on all my linux computers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Beans
    735

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    I would not say they are generally better as thats subjective to the user. Give me GIMP over MSPaint any day.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Beans
    239
    Distro
    Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    Quote Originally Posted by Naiki Muliaina View Post
    I would not say they are generally better as thats subjective to the user. Give me GIMP over MSPaint any day.
    He said mtpaint, not mspaint.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    too often ashore....
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    @KeithPeter - what he said!

    Sometimes on very lightweight hardware I find that Midori is the only browser option due to shortage of RAM. But even then, loading todays web pages can eat RAM up bigtime.
    RM Tablet Bodhi 1.4 & XP. Sempron d/top SuSE, Ubu 1004. AMD 244 d/top Ubu 1004 & Bodhi. Acer 5684 Ubu 1004 . Acer 4315 Ubu 1004 & Bodhi. Plus KNOPPIX & Puppy Live - & Bodhi Linux everywhere else

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Beans
    3,186

    Re: Small Light Programs Better

    For every task that I have I have a minimal number of features that I need to be efficient. Anything over that is bloat.

    The problem is that people have different needs. What works for one person is not enough for another, a huge program would potentially serve more people.

    Linux has so much diversity and many people are not taking advantage of it. At one point I was using 5 - 6 distros with all sorts of DE in any possible configuration. I settled at Gentoo + XFCE, but I do use a number of Gnome apps like evince and sometimes Gnome Mplayer.

    I think people should do the same, try a whole bunch of stuff and see what works the best. Don't always settle for the defaults.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •